|
Post by jamie on Jun 17, 2003 6:30:31 GMT -5
We've been fishing around in the Admin section recently and we can change the number of posts someone has made. We will very shortly be boosting Jamie's, which hopefully will shut him up for the time being, though that seems rather unlikely. PJ x thanks for that. I'd be perfectly happy if you just put it back to what it was, ie 2700 as this gives me a bit of an unfair advantage
|
|
|
Post by Jonny on Jun 17, 2003 6:32:00 GMT -5
We've been fishing around in the Admin section recently and we can change the number of posts someone has made. We will very shortly be boosting Jamie's, which hopefully will shut him up for the time being, though that seems rather unlikely. PJ x £20 of virtual internet money on Jamie complaining his number of posts is too high ;D EDIT: I wrote this and THEN read the thing above- honest, that's why I edited this, just so you know I wasn't cheating or anything.
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Jun 17, 2003 6:36:03 GMT -5
£20 of virtual internet money on Jamie complaining his number of posts is too high ;D EDIT: I wrote this and THEN read the thing above- honest, that's why I edited this, just so you know I wasn't cheating or anything. Contrary to what everyone believes, i don't always complain
|
|
|
Post by Popjustice.com on Jun 17, 2003 6:46:14 GMT -5
We quite like your new number, Jamie.
The best way to make sure you don't have an unfair advantage might be to post slightly less, so that people have a chance to catch up.
PJ x
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Jun 17, 2003 10:14:35 GMT -5
We quite like your new number, Jamie. The best way to make sure you don't have an unfair advantage might be to post slightly less, so that people have a chance to catch up. PJ x Are you implying that I post in quantity rather than quality? And I'll have to wait like 5 years for people to catch me up.
|
|
|
Post by Popjustice.com on Jun 17, 2003 11:05:30 GMT -5
Yes, that is precisely the implication.
|
|
|
Post by Ms Buffay on Jun 17, 2003 11:06:18 GMT -5
I want losts of posts too !
|
|
|
Post by Ms Buffay on Jun 17, 2003 11:07:14 GMT -5
And 5 stars ... and new avatar ( but don't know what of). Hmm Darius would be nice!
|
|
|
Post by Poptastic UK on Jun 17, 2003 12:44:57 GMT -5
Quality not quantity is certainly the way to go.
Jessica
|
|
|
Post by Ms Buffay on Jun 17, 2003 13:32:35 GMT -5
Quality not quantity is certainly the way to go. Jessica Hmmm I do recall saying such a thing in the poll on qulaity or quantity ... I'll make do with my 305 posts for now and take comfort in the fact that I only have another 195 to go before I am popjustice almighty!
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Jun 18, 2003 3:18:12 GMT -5
I've got as high as possible in the PJ charts. I'm behind Nick and he's a good 100 posts ahead of me. And he has been here half as long as I have. I feel old. Sorry. I feel guilty...
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Jun 18, 2003 4:12:08 GMT -5
Sorry. I feel guilty... don't
|
|
|
Post by Hula on Jun 18, 2003 9:55:50 GMT -5
I'm sure someone's asked this before, but how do you see where you rank?
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Jun 18, 2003 9:57:59 GMT -5
I'm sure someone's asked this before, but how do you see where you rank? click members then top 20 posters
|
|
|
Post by Hula on Jun 18, 2003 11:18:42 GMT -5
click members then top 20 posters Aha! Thank you! I couldn't find it before because the writing is so bloody hard to read!I'm not surprised to see that I'm nowhere near the Top 20.
|
|