|
|
Post by ohwhatanight on Jul 9, 2003 11:05:09 GMT -5
Did they just blatantly nick the whole Simon Cowell/Prince William-the-popstar idea from PJ, or were you implicated in pp32-33 of this weeks "magazine of the year"?
|
|
|
|
Post by FairyCakes on Jul 9, 2003 12:37:59 GMT -5
i was thinking that too. That wills story is everywhere now...but we all know who told us first.,.....lovely pj!  |
|
yorkpete
Popjustice member*
He's the boy who never ages, rides a goat around the lake
Posts: 600
|
Post by yorkpete on Jul 10, 2003 8:30:24 GMT -5
A lot of journos read popjustice factJournos can't resist stealing such stories, it saves them work. It's not stealing as such, anyway, as he just said in an interview ages ago he'd like to turn wills into a popstar. They've added the revelant angle (i.e. Wills is 21 so now it's appropriate and topical to run it) Did they just blatantly nick the whole Simon Cowell/Prince William-the-popstar idea from PJ, or were you implicated in pp32-33 of this weeks "magazine of the year"? |
|
|
|
Post by Popjustice.com on Jul 12, 2003 5:53:39 GMT -5
It looks like Heat took the idea from what we wrote - if they'd had the idea themselves, then they would have run it during the week of William's 21st, not a fortnight later.
But that's how journalism works, innit.
PJ
x
|
|
|
|
Post by Forgive Me Jenny Elly Moondial on Jul 12, 2003 19:00:52 GMT -5
This site gets pieces nicked and used by a big-selling showbiz magazine.
The Other Site has their bits nicked by the 3am girls & other tabloids and usually ends up in the Wicked Whispers section or such, mainly due to being less likely to be true.
Not that not being true is a problem for me.
|
|
